Le personnel politique de Montréal, 1880-1914 : évolution d’une élite municipale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre 1880 et 1914, 234 hommes sont élus au Conseil municipal de Montréal, à titre de conseiller, maire ou commissaire. Grâce à la biographie collective, il est possible de faire ressortir certaines caractéristiques de cette élite politique. La supériorité numérique croissante des francophones se manifeste, tandis que le recul des anglophones affecte particulièrement les Irlandais. Malgré le poids croissant des membres des professions libérales, les hommes d'affaires dominent tout au long de la période, aussi bien parmi les francophones que chez les anglophones. L'étude permet en outre de dégager certains traits de la carrière politique municipale: longévité et accès à la présidence d'un comité pour un grand nombre de conseillers, mais aussi brièveté du passage au Conseil pour la moitié d'entre eux et présence d'au moins le quart des élus sur la scène provinciale ou fédérale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".