Joint Source-Channel Decoding of Multiple Description Quantized Markov Sequences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a framework for joint source-channel decoding of Markov sequences that are coded by a fixed-rate multiple description quantizer (MDQ), and transmitted via a lossy network. This framework is suited for lossy networks of primitive energy-deprived source encoders. Our technical approach is one of maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) sequence estimation that exploits both the source memory and the correlation between different MDQ descriptions. We solve the MAP estimation problem by computing the longest path in a weighted directed acyclic graph, at a complexity of O(L/sup 2/NK), where N is the number of source symbols in the input sequence, K is the number of MDQ descriptions, and L is the number of codewords of the central quantizer. If the source sequence is Gaussian Markovian, the decoder complexity can be reduced to O(LNK). For MDQ-compressed Markov sequences impaired by both bit errors and erasure errors, the performance of joint source-channel MAP decoder can be 6 dB higher than the conventional hard-decision decoder. Furthermore, the new MDQ decoding technique unifies the treatments of different subsets of the K descriptions available at the decoder, circumventing the thorny issue of requiring up to 2/sup K/ - 1 MDQ side decoders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it