MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134444393 · doi:10.1109/wts.2007.4563332

Local fast re-authentication protocol for 3G-WLAN interworking architecture

2007· article· en· W2134444393 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Al Shidhani, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthentication protocolLightweight Extensible Authentication ProtocolChallenge-Handshake Authentication ProtocolComputer networkComputer scienceData Authentication AlgorithmGeneric Bootstrapping ArchitectureAuthentication (law)Chip Authentication ProgramChallenge–response authenticationProtocol (science)Message authentication codeComputer securityCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many advantages are attained by integrating 3G and WLAN systems to form a 3G-WLAN interworking architecture. However, securing the architecture is a great challenge because of the number of vulnerabilities introduced. EAP-AKA is the authentication solution adopted by the 3GPP to secure accesses to 3G-WLAN architectures. Two types of EAP-AKA authentication are available, full authentication and fast re-authentication. This paper presents a localized fast re-authentication protocol to substitute the standard fast re-authentication protocol. The proposed protocol achieves faster re-authentication by locally performing the authentication procedure. A new keying framework is introduced to minimize authentication delays during re-authentication and handover operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207