MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Simulations of Internal Gravity Wave Breaking in the Middle Atmosphere: The Influence of Dispersion and Three-Dimensionalization

2001· article· en· W2134450492 on OpenAlexafffund
Y. D. Afanasyev, W. R. Peltier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBreaking wavePhysicsMechanicsGravity waveInstabilityMomentum transferInternal waveMomentum (technical analysis)BuoyancyWavelengthWavenumberStratified flowsClassical mechanicsStratified flowWave propagationTurbulenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of new analyses of the problem of the evolution of the internal gravity wave field that is excited when a uniformly stratified fluid flows over monochromatic topography is presented.Results demonstrate that upward-propagating waves overturn and break when they reach sufficient amplitude.The breaking of the wave field may occur due to either one or the other of two main effects, namely, the instability of the propagating wave front and the instability of the wave established behind the advancing front.The analysis of the wavemean flow momentum transfer process reveals significant differences between these results and the predictions of two main gravity wave drag parameterization schemes (viz., those based upon so-called saturation theory and the spectral theory based on the critical layer absorption mechanism) regarding the dynamics of wave breaking and the spatial distribution of the resulting momentum transfer.The vertical extent and structure of the breaking region and, hence, the momentum transfer from the wave field to the mean flow, are shown to be highly sensitive to the governing parameter aN/U (U and N are, respectively, the velocity and buoyancy frequency characteristic of the upstream incident flow, while a is the wavelength of a quasi-topographic forcing).This nondimensional parameter provides a measure of the importance of nonhydrostatic effects.When the flow is allowed to access the third spatial dimension, the simulations demonstrate that it develops intense three-dimensional motions in the regions of wave breaking.An instability first appears in the form of streamwise-oriented vortices of alternating sign that are consistent with typical convective instability patterns observed previously by different authors.It was observed, however, that two-dimensional coherence of the main flow is still maintained at the coarse-grain scale although the instability does lead to the onset of small-scale turbulence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207