MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134458092 · doi:10.1109/secon.2005.1423294

SIP End-to-End Security between Ipv4 Domain and Ipv6 Domain

2005· article· en· W2134458092 on OpenAlexafffund
Xing Jiang, J. William Atwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkIPv6End-to-end principleSession Initiation ProtocolIPv4PromelaDomain (mathematical analysis)The InternetOperating systemServerFormal verificationProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The session initiation protocol (SIP) carries the endpoint IP addresses, as part of its message format. When one end-point is in an IPv4 addressing domain, and the other is in an IPv6 addressing domain, a NAT-PT gateway must be used at the network level, to translate the protocol headers. The message bodies are altered by an application level gateway (ALG), to reflect the changed addresses. However, this alteration causes end-to-end security mechanisms to fail. We describe a proposal for a SIP end-to-end security mechanism between IPv4 networks and IPv6 stub domains, which overcomes the failure. We have validated the proposal using the PROMELA formal specification language and the SPIN validation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207