The antigen-binding site of an N-propionylated polysialic acid-specific antibody protective against group B meningococci is consistent with extended epitopes†
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies 13D9 and 6B9 are both specific for N-propionylated polysialic acid (NPrPSA); however, while 13D9 is protective against meningitis caused by group B meningococci and Escherichia coli capsular type K1 infection, 6B9 is not. The crystal structures of the Fabs from the two antibodies determined at 2.06 and 2.45 Å resolutions, respectively, reveal markedly different combining sites, where only the surface of 13D9 is consistent with the recognition of extended helical epitopes known to exist in the capsular polysaccharides of etiological agents of meningitis. Interestingly, complementarity determining region H2 on 13D9 lies in a non-canonical conformation that docking studies show is a critical feature in the generation of negative free energy of binding. Finally, the model of extended NPrPSA decasaccharide bound to 13D9 derived from docking studies is consistent with saturation transfer difference nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Together, these results provide further evidence that extended epitopes have the ability to break immune tolerance associated with the polysialic acid capsule of these pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".