Epithelial Na+ Channel (ENaC) Expression in the Developing Normal and Abnormal Human Perinatal Lung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaired lung epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC) activity at the time of birth results in respiratory distress. To investigate potential mechanisms, the ontogeny and cellular distribution of the alphaENaC subunit mRNA expression was studied in normal, immature, and abnormal (hypoplastic) human fetal lungs using nonradioisotopic in situ hybridization. Surprisingly, alphaENaC expression was detected at the embryonic stage of normal lung development (4 to 5 wk gestation) when expression was localized to the fetal lung bud epithelium. By late gestation, ENaC was expressed in the conductive and respiratory airway epithelium, serous cells, and the distal lung unit in an alveolar type II (ATII) epitheliumlike distribution. Significant alphaENaC expression was found in newborn lung diseases associated with respiratory distress. One explanation is that alphaENaC mRNA is constitutively expressed, and that activity is regulated, at least in part, at the post-transcriptional level. Alternative explanations are that the expression of the beta or gammaENaC subunits may be impaired in certain newborn lung diseases or that alternate Na(+) permeant channels or transporters are important to lung liquid absorption in humans at birth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".