MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134470982 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2011.5938158

A study on resistive-type truncated CVNS Distributed Neural Networks

2011· article· en· W2134470982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Resistive touchscreenComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed Neural Networks (DNNs) are generally providing self-scaling property together with higher noise immunity for resistive-type neural networks. Continuous Valued Number System (CVNS) is a potential candidate to build the DNNs; however, implementation of a CVNS digit in its complete form needs a high resolution environment which is not practical. Truncation methods are applied to CVNS digits to make them adaptable to the low resolution environments. However, truncated CVNS operations may decrease the accuracy and immunity to noise compared to the complete CVNS operations. In this work, a truncated CVNS DNN is proposed, and studies over Noise to Signal Ratio (NSR) and accuracy are provided. Studies show that the accuracy is acceptable, and the NSR is still less than the NSR of conventional DNNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207