Bibliographic record
Abstract
La violence traverse toutes les écritures contemporaines britanniques; elle permet de mesurer le rapport au réel de ces dramaturgies et d’appréhender leurs innovations formelles. S’il convient de se méfier des inévitables catalogues de supplices (auxquels la critique journalistique a plus ou moins réduit Anéantis de Sarah Kane à sa création), on peut s’interroger sur le sens et la portée d’un supplice tout particulier dans cinq pièces : Anéantis et Purifiés de Sarah Kane, Le traitement de Martin Crimp, Faust is Dead de Mark Ravenhill et Maudit crépuscule d’Howard Barker, à savoir le supplice de l’énucléation. L’oeil arraché apparaît d’abord comme un organe obscène, une sorte de résumé du réel le plus brut, puis comme un symbole du voyeurisme puni, voyeurisme qui constitue une forme particulièrement insidieuse de violence. Ce n’est qu’au bout de ce trajet que l’énucléation retrouve la portée tragique que lui donne Sophocle. L’ampleur symbolique de ce supplice répond en quelque sorte à cette double postulation du théâtre anglais, entre pessimisme postmoderne et nostalgie de l’humanisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".