MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134495176 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.096002

Critical point and scale setting in SU(3) plasma: An update

2015· article· en· W2134495176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersRWTH Aachen UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsLambdaOrder (exchange)Mathematical physicsGauge theoryCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore a method developed in statistical physics which has been argued to have exponentially small finite-volume effects, in order to determine the critical temperature ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}$ of pure SU(3) gauge theory close to the continuum limit. The method allows us to estimate the critical coupling ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{c}$ of the Wilson action for temporal extents up to ${N}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}\ensuremath{\sim}20$ with $\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.1%$ uncertainties. Making use of the scale setting parameters ${r}_{0}$ and $\sqrt{{t}_{0}}$ in the same range of $\ensuremath{\beta}$-values, these results lead to the independent continuum extrapolations ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}{r}_{0}=0.7457(45)$ and ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}\sqrt{{t}_{0}}=0.2489(14)$, with the latter originating from a more convincing fit. Inserting a conversion of ${r}_{0}$ from literature (unfortunately with much larger errors) yields ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}/{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}=1.24(10)$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it