MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134495533

Les thrombopénies constitutionnelles : de la clinique à la biologie

2003· article· fr· W2134495533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Trichet, Anne Beauchamp‐Nicoud, Valérie Proulle, Brigitte Bader‐Meunier, G Tchernia, Michel Dreyfus

Bibliographic record

VenueHématologie · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicinePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les thrombopenies constitutionnelles sont des maladies rares, trop souvent meconnues. Elles doivent etre evoquees devant toute thrombopenie chronique apres avoir exclu une origine acquise, essentiellement immune (purpura thrombopenique auto‐immun ou PTAI). Souvent difficile, le diagnostic repose sur un faisceau d‘arguments cliniques tels que les antecedents hemorragiques personnels et familiaux et des signes biologiques tels que les anomalies morphologiques des plaquettes. La reponse aux traitements traditionnels du PTAI, le plus souvent absente ou mediocre, peut egalement faire evoquer le diagnostic. Une fois l‘origine constitutionnelle de la thrombopenie etablie, il est essentiel de la caracteriser afin de connaitre le risque hemorragique associe, d‘en predire l‘evolution et donc de proposer une therapeutique adaptee. Dans un nombre de cas croissant, l‘anomalie genetique est connue, ce qui facilite considerablement le diagnostic. De surcroit, l‘identification des anomalies moleculaires responsables debouche vers une meilleure comprehension de la megacaryocytopoiese et peut permettre une ebauche de classement. Les thrombopenies par hypo‐ ou amegacaryocytose (thrombopenie et aplasie radiale, amegacaryocytose congenitale, amegacaryocytose et synostose radio‐cubitale) refletent l‘atteinte precoce de la megacaryocytopoiese. Les defauts de GATA1 ou Ets‐1, facteurs de transcription essentiels a tous les stades de la differenciation megacaryocytaire et erythropoietique, seraient responsables de la thrombopenie liee a l‘X avec dyserythropoiese ou encore de la thrombopenie familiale de Paris‐Trousseau. Les thrombopenies liees a un defaut de maturation du megacaryocyte ou dysmegacaryocytopoiese sont secondaires soit a l‘atteinte des granules α (syndrome des plaquettes grises, syndrome plaquettaire Quebec), soit a un defaut d‘organisation du cytosquelette megacaryocytaire (syndrome MYH9) ou de ses connexions avec les proteines de surface (syndrome de Bernard‐Soulier). Les thrombopenies de la maladie de Willebrand 2B ou du pseudo‐Willebrand plaquettaire sont de mecanisme peripherique, par agglutination des plaquettes secondaire a l‘augmentation de l‘affinite du facteur Willebrand pour le complexe GPIb‐IX‐V. Il pourrait en etre de meme pour le syndrome de Wiskott‐Aldrich et sa forme clinique, la thrombopenie liee a l‘X, par acceleration de l‘apoptose plaquettaire. Ainsi, les thrombopenies constitutionnelles sont des modeles qui illustrent la complexite de la megacaryocytopoiese et permettent de progresser dans la comprehension de ses mecanismes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHématologieSame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207