Design and construction of an efficient electro-optic modulator for laser spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We discuss design considerations and construction of a home-built electro-optic phase modulator (EOM) that can be used for locking a laser to an atomic transition. The EOM is designed to operate at a resonant frequency of ≈20 MHz and imposes a phase modulation on a laser beam. The phase-modulated light is sent through a reference cell containing a dilute gas of rubidium atoms. When the laser is scanned over an atomic resonance, the absorption of light through the cell can be detected and mixed down to DC to produce a dispersion shaped “error” signal. The error signal can be used to lock the laser to the atomic resonance. We also describe tests of the basic properties of the resonant circuit. The Q of the circuit is measured to be 10, resulting in 60% efficiency for the first-order sidebands at RF drive powers of 0.7 W. Applications include the spectroscopy of laser-cooled atoms.PACS Nos.: 01.50.Pa, 39.25.+k 32.80.Pj, 42.62.Fi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".