MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134506516 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2009.2015275

A Two-Dimensional Optical True Time-Delay Beamformer Consisting of a Fiber Bragg Grating Prism and Switch-Based Fiber-Optic Delay Lines

2009· article· en· W2134506516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrue time delayFiber Bragg gratingOpticsBeam steeringPrismBeamformingOptical fiberPhysicsPhased arrayPlanarGratingWavelengthGroup delay and phase delayWavelength-division multiplexingAntenna (radio)Materials scienceBeam (structure)Computer scienceTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional optical true time-delay (TTD) beamforming system for a planar phased array antenna (PAA) is proposed and demonstrated. The optical beamforming system consists of a fiber-Bragg-grating-prism-based wavelength-dependent TTD (WD-TTD) unit for azimuth beam steering and a microelectromechanical-system-switch-based wavelength-independent TTD (WI-TTD) unit for elevation beam steering. The time delays generated by the WD-TTD and WI-TTD are measured. The results show that the proposed system can achieve the required time delays with the time-delay errors for the WD-TTD and the WI-TTD at 1 GHz less than 11.8 and 3.6 ps, which correspond to radiation direction errors of less than 1.5deg and 0.4deg for a planar PAA with the adjacent array elements spaced by a half radio-frequency wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it