MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Microstructural Parameters of HPMC/PVP Polymer Blends Using Wide Angle X-Ray Technique

2012· article· en· W2134516701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research Updates in Polymer Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolyvinylpyrrolidoneCrystallitePolymerScanning electron microscopeUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialPolymer blendWide-angle X-ray scatteringScatteringSmall-angle neutron scatteringPolymer chemistryOpticsNeutron scatteringCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroxypropylemethylecellulose (HPMC) and Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) polymer virgin and blend films were prepared and investigated using wide angle X-ray scattering method. Microstructural parameters like lattice strain (g %), the crystallite size for individual the Bragg’s reflection (hkl) have been computed using line profile analysis and hence by whole pattern fitting method. The X-ray diffraction study reveals that the blending of PVP decreases the crystallanity of HPMC up to 5:4 concentration and then increases. Measured tensile strength decreases, Young’s Modulus decreases, and % elongation increases as the concentration of PVP increases. The surface morphology investigated using scanning electron microscope, shows that the two polymers were miscible in all concentration range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it