MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134557529 · doi:10.1002/we.1538

Development of a geophysic model output statistics module for improving short‐term numerical wind predictions over complex sites

2012· article· en· W2134557529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWind Energy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)Université de MonctonEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaÉcole de Technologie SupérieureNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeteorologyNumerical weather predictionTerrainTerm (time)GridMean squared errorGlobal Forecast SystemWeather Research and Forecasting ModelEnvironmental scienceForecast skillForecast verificationModel output statisticsRepresentation (politics)ClimatologyStatisticsMathematicsGeographyGeologyGeodesyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Developed for short‐term (0–48 h) wind power forecasting purposes, high‐resolution meteorological forecasts for Eastern Canada are available from Environment Canada's Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model configured on a limited area (GEM‐LAM). This paper uses 3 years of forecast data from this model for the region of North Cape (Prince Edward Island, Canada). Although the model resolution is relatively high (2.5 km), statistical analysis and site inspection reveal that the model does not have a sufficiently refined grid to properly represent the meteorological phenomena over this complex coastal site. To cope with such representation error, a generalized Geophysic Model Output Statistics (GMOS) module is developed and applied to reduce the forecast error of the NWP forecasts. GMOS differs from other Model Output Statistics (MOS) that are widely used by meteorological centres in the following aspects: (i) GMOS takes into account the surrounding geophysical parameters such as surface roughness, terrain height, etc., along with wind direction; (ii) GMOS can be directly applied for model output correction without any training. Compared with other methods, GMOS using a multiple grid point approach improves the GEM‐LAM predictions root mean squared error by 1–5% for all time horizons and most meteorological conditions. Also, the topographic signature of the forecast error (uneven directional distribution of the forecast error related to the surface characteristics) due to misrepresentation issues is significantly reduced. The NWP forecasts combined with GMOS outperform the persistence model from a 2 h horizon, instead of 3 h using MOS. Finally, GMOS is applied and validated at two other sites located in New Brunswick, Canada. Similar improvements on the forecasts were observed, thus showing the general applicability of GMOS. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it