Development of a geophysic model output statistics module for improving short‐term numerical wind predictions over complex sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Developed for short‐term (0–48 h) wind power forecasting purposes, high‐resolution meteorological forecasts for Eastern Canada are available from Environment Canada's Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model configured on a limited area (GEM‐LAM). This paper uses 3 years of forecast data from this model for the region of North Cape (Prince Edward Island, Canada). Although the model resolution is relatively high (2.5 km), statistical analysis and site inspection reveal that the model does not have a sufficiently refined grid to properly represent the meteorological phenomena over this complex coastal site. To cope with such representation error, a generalized Geophysic Model Output Statistics (GMOS) module is developed and applied to reduce the forecast error of the NWP forecasts. GMOS differs from other Model Output Statistics (MOS) that are widely used by meteorological centres in the following aspects: (i) GMOS takes into account the surrounding geophysical parameters such as surface roughness, terrain height, etc., along with wind direction; (ii) GMOS can be directly applied for model output correction without any training. Compared with other methods, GMOS using a multiple grid point approach improves the GEM‐LAM predictions root mean squared error by 1–5% for all time horizons and most meteorological conditions. Also, the topographic signature of the forecast error (uneven directional distribution of the forecast error related to the surface characteristics) due to misrepresentation issues is significantly reduced. The NWP forecasts combined with GMOS outperform the persistence model from a 2 h horizon, instead of 3 h using MOS. Finally, GMOS is applied and validated at two other sites located in New Brunswick, Canada. Similar improvements on the forecasts were observed, thus showing the general applicability of GMOS. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".