MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134592704 · doi:10.1067/mhn.2001.111713

Rathke's Cleft Cyst Presenting as Sphenoid Sinusitis

2001· article· en· W2134592704 on OpenAlexaff
Remi Nader, Saul Frenkiel, Gérard Mohr, Leslie St. Jacques, Donatella Tampieri, Steffen Albrecht

Bibliographic record

VenueOtolaryngology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSinusitisTranssphenoidal surgerySphenoidal sinusSphenoid boneCystOtorhinolaryngologySella turcicaNeuroradiologyRadiologySurgeryNeurologyPathologySkullPituitary adenoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rathke's cleft cysts are developmental abnormalities of the craniopharyngeal duct composed of retained stratified ciliated cuboidal cells of the respiratory type. Incidentally found in the pars intermedia in 13% to 33% of routine autopsies, they are discovered in growing numbers on CT and MRI scans. From 1991 to 1999, 9 cases of Rathke's cleft cysts were encountered by the senior authors, 4 of which were treated surgically (3 by using a transsphenoidal approach and one by using a transcranial subfrontal approach). Of the 3 patients treated with a transsphenoidal approach, 2 presented with symptoms mimicking sphenoid sinusitis and were initially referred for otolaryngologic evaluation. The clinical, pathologic, and radiologic features, as well as management and follow-up of those 2 patients, are reviewed. There has been only one previous case report of Rathke's cleft cysts presenting as sinusitis. Nevertheless, the otolaryngologist should be aware of this condition because it may present with other significant symptomatic extracranial extensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtolaryngologySame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207