La technique 5–6 comme modèle descriptif d’un aspect de l’élaboration du vocabulaire chromatique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose un modèle théorique pour la compréhension des répertoires romantique et postromantique : celui de la syncope consonante 5–6. Ce modèle se défend à la lumière, d’une part, des relations de fondamentales de tierce et, d’autre part, de l’élaboration du vocabulaire chromatique que ces répertoires comportent. Les exemples sont puisés aux œuvres de Debussy, Fauré, Liszt, Schoenberg, Richard Strauss et Wolf, parce qu’elles présentent une « idée de base » décrite par la technique 5–6, qui subit plusieurs transformations. De telles œuvres contribuent à affaiblir l’harmonie fonctionnelle et, surtout, à mettre en valeur l’accord de sixte ajoutée dans la fonction de tonique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".