MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134634375 · doi:10.1115/1.4029880

Real-Time Control of Maximum Heat Release Rate and Its Influence on Emission Dispersions in Diesel Engines

2015· article· en· W2134634375 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Seungsuk Oh, Myoungho Sunwoo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsCombustionMean effective pressureDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringDiesel engineDispersion (optics)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceExhaust gas recirculationInternal combustion engineChemistryEngineeringCompression ratioPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unexpected combustions dispersion due to variations in fuel quality, production tolerance, and aging of components results in the deterioration of engine performance and increases harmful emissions. Many researchers have studied real-time combustion monitoring and control to maintain performance even under undesirable or abnormal conditions. They have reported that the reduction of combustion dispersion is promising for the decrease of emissions dispersion. In this study, we control the maximum heat release (HR) to compensate for combustion dispersion and compared the relationship between before and after control. The maximum rate of heat release (ROHRmax) is an important parameter and is highly related to engine performance and emission level. The control experiments were carried out using a diesel engine at 1500 rpm and brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) of 400 kPa, while the engine parameters were varied. The varied parameters were fuel rail pressure, swirl valve, pilot injection timing, and duration. The experimental results showed that control of the ROHRmax has the potential for the reduction of the dispersions of particulate matter (PM) emission and combustion noise even in unexpected combustion environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207