On rate-optimal MIMO signalling with mean and covariance feedback
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a single-user multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system in which the transmitter has access to both the channel covariance and the channel mean. For this scenario, we provide an explicit second-order approximation of the ergodic capacity of the channel, and we use this approximation to show that when the channel has a non-zero mean, the basis of the optimal input covariance matrix depends on the input signal power. (This basis is independent of the signal power in the zero-mean case.) The second-order approximation also provides insight into the way in which the low-signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) optimal input covariance matrix is related to the optimal input covariance matrix at arbitrary SNRs. Furthermore, we show that the design of the input covariance matrix that optimizes the second-order approximation can be cast as a convex optimization problem for which the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions completely characterize the optimal solution. Using these conditions, we provide an efficient algorithm for obtaining second-order optimal input covariance matrices. The resulting covariances confirm our theoretical observation that, in general, the low-SNR optimal signal basis does not coincide with the optimal basis at higher SNRs. Finally, we show how our second-order design algorithm can be used to efficiently obtain input covariance matrices that provide ergodic rates that approach the ergodic capacity of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".