MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134656124 · doi:10.2174/1566524013363348

Anti-CD45RB Monoclonal Antibody-Mediated Transplantation Tolerance

2001· review· en· W2134656124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Molecular Medicine · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosuppressionMonoclonal antibodyImmunologyMedicineImmune toleranceTransplantationMalignancyImmune systemAntibodyMonoclonalImmunityPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, lifelong immunosuppression is required for organ transplant recipients. The majority of transplant recipients will eventually develop chronic rejection with resultant graft loss, despite treatment with powerful immunosuppressive agents. These agents are also associated with numerous toxicities including reduced immunity against infection and malignancy. Therefore, the central goal in transplant science is to devise tolerance strategies in an attempt to establish a state of prolonged non-reactivity against the allograft, accompanied with preservation of an intact immune system. Although predictable tolerance induction has been elusive, we found that short course of the novel immunomodulatory agent, anti-CD45RB monoclonal antibody, leads to indefinite acceptance of renal allografts in mice, and has been shown to markedly prolong allograft survival in primates. We review the current state of development of this antibody, and the progress made in defining its mechanism of action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it