MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Immunologic Approach to the Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes

2015· article· en· W2134662842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Osman Gürol

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Pathology and Microbiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathogenesisMedicineComputer scienceImmunologyComputational biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 1 diabetes is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Genetic and environmental factors induce chronic autoimmunity against pancreatic beta cells. As time passes, autoimmunity gives rise to beta cell loss and overt diabetes. The immune system reacts against foreign substances such as microbes, and macromolecules like proteins and polysaccharides. The specific immune response is able to distinguish the body’s own macromolecules from those that are extraneous. Tolerance is a process where the immune system learns to live with macromolecules of the body in which it belongs, and maintains and develops the ability to react against foreign molecules. However, if the immune system reacts against its own members, the tolerance can be broken naturally. This can happen through cessation of the repression that prevents immune cells reacting against components of the body or by alterations in cells that the body does not recognize as self. This phenomenon is called autoimmunity. The pathogenesis begins with the activation of potentially self-reactive T lymphocytes. The serious loss of pancreatic beta cells and infiltration of pancreatic islets by lymphocytes that create insulitis represent the pathology of type 1 diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Pathology and MicrobiologySame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207