MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134694908 · doi:10.1109/leos.2000.894085

Theoretical model of gain-saturated semiconductor optical amplifiers in cross-phase modulation wavelength converters

2002· article· en· W2134694908 on OpenAlexaff
S.-C. Cao, John C. Cartledge, E. Berolo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-phase modulationOptical amplifierInterferometryConvertersPhase modulationModulation (music)WavelengthSaturation (graph theory)Optical switchOptical communicationOpticsPhysicsMach–Zehnder interferometerOptoelectronicsPhase noisePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to obtain high conversion speed and strong nonlinearity, semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) in wavelength converters are operated with large bias currents and high optical powers. Therefore, the SOAs are strongly gain-saturated. For modeling wavelength converters based on cross-phase modulation (XPM) in SOAs, the effect of saturation on the optical phase needs to be considered. In this paper, we report a simple formula to calculate the optical phase for XPM in SOAs. The model is used to simulate a XPM wavelength converter using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). The theoretical results are in good agreement with published experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207