MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134709562 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.875188

Noise figure optimization of inductively degenerated CMOS LNAs with integrated gate inductors

2006· article· en· W2134709562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorNoise figureElectronic engineeringCascodeCMOSAmplifierNoise (video)Low-noise amplifierElectrical engineeringEngineeringEffective input noise temperatureTransistorComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses noise figure optimization techniques for inductively degenerated cascode CMOS low-noise amplifiers (LNAs) with on-chip gate inductors. Seven different optimizations techniques are discussed. Of these, five new cases provide power match and balance the transistor noise contribution and the noise contribution from all parasitic resistances in the gate circuit to achieve the best noise performance under the constraints of integrated gate inductor quality factor, power consumption, and gain. Three of the power matched techniques (two power constrained optimizations and a gain-and-power constrained optimization) are recommended as design strategies. These three optimization techniques significantly improve the noise figures for LNA designs that are to employ on-chip gate inductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it