Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibular aplasia with split hand/foot or other defects of the central axis is a rare disorder that shares several characteristics with the better known tibial aplasia-ectrodactyly syndrome. They appear to be inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. In both, however, the phenotype is markedly variable, penetrance is reduced, and apparently sporadic cases are relatively frequent. We report a new case of this disorder and review the clinical and demographic findings in 47 others identified from the literature or other sources. A key observation was that the sex ratio is biased toward males, especially in apparently sporadic cases. This male bias is largely explained by a lower penetrance rate in women. Both affected males and females had affected children, but the risk to offspring was higher when the mother carried the gene, in keeping with a mixed model for genetic susceptibility, i.e., the penetrance of the major predisposing gene is acting against a multifactorially determined level of liability. Given the high degree of nonpenetrance and very variable expressivity, counseling with respect to recurrence risk is problematic and will likely remain so, even when the major predisposing gene is identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".