Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le contenu photographique des magazines féminins pour adolescentes produits au Québec. Le corpus est constitué de 345 photographies extraites des trois titres en circulation en 2002 : Cool , Adorable et Filles d’aujourd’hui . La technique utilisée est l’analyse de contenu des médias, qui permet de produire des relevés descriptifs exhaustifs répondant aux critières de validité et de reproductibilité scientifiques. Le choix des variables de recherche s’appuie sur la théorie sémiotique, tandis que leur opérationnalisation s’inspire des récents travaux qui prennent comme objet d’investigation les représentations iconographiques de la culture populaire. Les résultats révèlent la forte teneur publicitaire des messages visuels et le conservatisme des rapports sociaux de sexe qu’ils représentent. Ils montrent aussi la productivité scientifique de la combinaison des méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives en sciences sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it