Le devenir politique des corps recomposés : la circulation des animaux dans l’espace public
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les politiques de la nature sont marquées par des questions nouvelles sur la place à accorder à une liste toujours plus longue et hétérogène de prétendants à la vie publique. Plus d’un demi-siècle après leur disparition complète, les loups réapparaissent en France au début des années 1990. Depuis lors, les paroles se sont amplifiées, propagées et ont pris très vite les tournures d’une véritable dispute publique. Pourtant, l’animal en chair et en os reste bien souvent invisible et insaisissable. Cet article interroge les conditions de possibilité de la présence publique des loups à partir de trois « modes corporels » de loups : le corps entier, le corps disséminé et le corps recomposé. Il tente de répondre successivement à trois questions : comment les loups échappent-ils aux dispositifs de contrôle de la nature ? Comment font-ils acte de présence ? Comment se présentent-ils aux publics ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".