Psoriasis vulgaris and acute guttate psoriasis in a family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 33‐year‐old man (Case 1) developed scaling and erythema on the extensor side of his extremities, head, and back, 3 years before his first visit to our hospital. The lesions spread out to form several plaques and became persistent ( Fig. 1a ). Serum antistreptolysin O (ASO) was within the normal range and a pharyngeal culture showed normal flora. Histologic findings were compatible with psoriasis vulgaris ( Fig. 1b ). Topical steroid therapy was effective; however, scaling and erythema persisted. (a) Well‐demarcated scaling and erythema on the leg of Case 1. (b) Skin biopsy specimen from scaling and erythema showing hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, elongated rete ridges, and inflammatory cell infiltration into the epidermis image The 8‐year‐old daughter (Case 2) of Case 1 had suffered severe tonsillitis 2 months prior to the skin eruptions. Numerous rain drop‐like scaly papules appeared on her legs and generalized rapidly ( Fig. 2a ). Her tonsils were swollen and reddish. Streptococcus pyogenes was detected by pharyngeal smear. The ASO value was at a high level. Histologic examination showed slightly elongated rete ridges, focal lack of the granular layer, parakeratosis, mild spongiosis, and exostosis of neutrophils ( Fig. 2b ). She was diagnosed with acute guttate psoriasis. Administration of oral antimicrobials reduced the ASO value and led to remission of the disease. After 1 month of antimicrobial treatment, the erythematous papules disappeared. (a) Numerous rain drop‐like scaly papules on the arm of Case 2. (b) Skin biopsy specimen from scaling and erythema showing elongated rete ridges, focal lack of granular layer, parakeratosis, mild spongiosis, and exostosis of neutrophils image The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of the father was HLA‐A24, A31, B7, B39, and Cw7, and that of the daughter was HLA‐A24, A31, B39, and Cw7. Both possessed HLA‐A24, B39, and Cw7. The HLA typing of other family members was also studied. The mother had HLA‐A11, A24, B39, B62, Cw4, and Cw7, and her son had HLA‐A11, A24, B7, B62, Cw4, and Cw7. The result of HLA typing is shown in Table 1 . Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing in family members Father (Case 1) A24 A31 B7 B39 Mother A11 A24 B39 B62 Cw4 Cw7 Daughter (Case 2) A24 A31 B39 Cw7 Son A11 A24 B7 B62 Cw4 Cw7 Lymphocyte stimulating test was performed using heat‐killed S. pyogenes which were boiled at 70 °C for 10 min and sonicated. The stimulation index was twofold higher in the daughter than in the father ( Fig. 3 ). The result of the lymphocyte stimulating test (LST) using heat‐killed S. pyogenes (S.I., stimulation index) image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".