Production of small, acid-soluble spore proteins in<i>Clostridium perfringens</i>nonfoodborne gastrointestinal disease isolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The molecular basis for the differences in heat resistance between spores of Clostridium perfringens food-borne versus nonfoodborne isolates remains unknown. Since a recent study demonstrated the role of small, acid-soluble spore proteins (SASPs) in heat resistance of spores of food-borne isolates, in the current study, we evaluated the expression of SASP-encoding genes (ssp) and the production of SASPs in nonfoodborne isolates. Our results demonstrated the presence of all three ssp genes in five surveyed nonfoodborne isolates. A beta-glucuronidase assay showed that these ssp genes are expressed specifically during sporulation. Furthermore, nonfoodborne isolate F4969 produced SASPs at a level similar to that of food-borne isolate SM101. Collectively, these results suggest that the difference in the levels of heat resistance between spores of food-borne and the nonfoodborne isolates is not the result of impaired expression of ssp genes and (or) decreased production of SASPs in nonfoodborne isolates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".