MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134795257 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh721

The effect of 6-mercaptopurine on early human placental explants

2005· article· en· W2134795257 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shelly Tartakover Matalon, Asher Ornoy, Ami Fishman, Liat Drucker, Michael Lishner

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv UniversityTel Aviv University
KeywordsMercaptopurineAndrologyExplant cultureBiologyMedicineObstetricsPharmacologyGeneticsIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is an antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drug. Recently, more women have received this drug during pregnancy. Animal studies have shown that 6-MP has deleterious effects on the fetus, while human data include prematurity, intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and malformations that occur especially when the drug is administered in the first trimester of pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of 6-MP on cellular functions of human trophoblast explants. METHODS: Human placental explants (5.5-9 weeks gestational age), that were grown on matrigel, were exposed to medium containing 6-MP for 5 days. Medium alone served as control. Extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cell migration assessment was performed by visual observation. Analysis of proliferating events of the trophoblast cells was assessed by immunohistochemical examination. Apoptosis was analyzed by Tunnel procedure and by anti-caspase 3 staining and hormone level by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: 6-MP inhibited migration of EVT cells from the villi to the matrigel with a lower proliferation rate and increased apoptosis of cytotrophoblast cells compared to controls. However, no significant effect of 6-MP on hormone levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: 6-MP inhibited migration and proliferation of trophoblast cells in first-trimester human placental explant culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207