Dual Polarization Detection of Ships and Icebergs - Recent Results with ENVISAT ASAR and Data Simulations of RADARSAT-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The RADARSAT-2 satellite is an advanced C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) with a variety of new modes including options for polarization combinations, resolution, and swath width. This paper examines the potential of multi polarization data for detecting and discriminating ship and iceberg targets Data used in this study consist of well validated airborne Convair-580 SAR and spaceborne ASAR HH/HV and HH/VV. In total, the data set used for evaluating detection and discrimination consists of 901 validated iceberg and ship targets. Optimizing target detection is accomplished using receiver operator curves (ROC) as proposed by [6] and discrimination is conducted using a quadratic discriminant (QD) with feature selection based on sequential forward selection (SFS). In general it was found that detection and discrimination improve with more polarimetric information; however, HH/HV and VV/VH only had nominally less discrimination performance than the quad polarization modes evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".