Mitochondrial Genome of the Colorless Green Alga Polytomella parva: Two Linear DNA Molecules with Homologous Inverted Repeat Termini
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of the well-characterized mitochondrial genomes from diverse green algal lineages are circular mapping DNA molecules; however, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has a linear 15.8 kb unit mitochondrial genome with 580 or 581 bp inverted repeat ends. In mitochondrial-enriched fractions prepared from Polytomella parva (=P. agilis), a colorless, naturally wall-less relative of C. reinhardtii, we have detected two linear mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) components with sizes of 13.5 and 3.5 kb. Sequences spanning 97% and 86% of the 13.5- and 3.5-kb mtDNAs, respectively, reveal that these molecules contain long, at least 1.3 kb, homologous inverted repeat sequences at their termini. The 3.5-kb mtDNA has only one coding region (nad6), the functionality of which is supported by both the relative rate at which it has accumulated nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions and its absence from the 13.5-kb mtDNA which encodes nine genes (i.e., large and small subunit rRNA [LSU and SSU rRNA] genes, one tRNA gene, and six protein-coding genes). On the basis of DNA sequence data, we propose that a variant start codon, GTG, is utilized by the P. parva 13.5-kb mtDNA-encoded gene, nad5. Using the relative rate test with Chlamydomonas moewusii (=C. eugametos) as the outgroup, we conclude that the nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rate in the mitochondrial protein-coding genes of P. parva is on an average about 3.3 times that of the C. reinhardtii counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".