MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134854911 · doi:10.1109/taes.2010.5417156

Composite GNSS Signal Acquisition over Multiple Code Periods

2010· article· en· W2134854911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceFalse alarmSatellite navigationGlobal Positioning SystemMonte Carlo methodStatistical powerCode (set theory)Data acquisitionAlgorithmReal-time computingSensor fusionConstant false alarm rateElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new signals employed by modern global navigation satellite system (GNSS) will be characterized by a data/pilot structure and by the presence of secondary codes. These innovations require special acquisition techniques for efficiently recovering all the transmitted power and dealing with the problem of sign transitions. In this paper three integration strategies, noncoherent, semi-coherent, and differentially coherent integrations, are analyzed for the joint acquisition of data and pilot signals over multiple primary code periods. Each strategy is statistically characterized and false alarm and detection probabilities are provided. To the best of our knowledge the characterization and comparison of these algorithms are new. Monte Carlo simulations and real data analysis demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it