MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134865073 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2007.4378328

Radio Resource Management in MIMO-OFDM- Mesh Networks: Issues and Approaches

2007· article· en· W2134865073 on OpenAlexaff
Dusit Niyato, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkReinforcement learningMIMOWireless mesh networkScheduling (production processes)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingRouterRadio resource managementGame theoryAdmission controlWirelessWireless networkStochastic gameQ-learningDistributed computingTelecommunicationsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a survey on the radio resource management issues in MIMO-OFDM-based infrastructure wireless mesh networks. The major components in radio resource management (i.e., scheduling and admission control) and related research issues are discussed. We review related work in the literature. We propose a game-theoretic model for admission control in IEEE 802.11n-based WMNs using the MIMO-OFDM technology. The proposed scheme uses Q-learning, which is a reinforcement learning algorithm, to gain knowledge on system performance. Then this knowledge is used to determine payoff for the game formulation to obtain the Nash equilibrium for the decision on admitting or rejecting a new connection at a mesh router.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207