MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134879438 · doi:10.1586/ehm.11.41

Inherited platelet disorders: a clinical approach to diagnosis and management

2011· review· en· W2134879438 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly Cox, Victoria Price, Walter H.A. Kahr

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Hematology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlateletPlatelet disorderBlood Platelet DisordersMucocutaneous zoneImmunologyPathologyIntensive care medicineBioinformaticsDiseasePlatelet aggregation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inherited platelet disorders encompass a heterogeneous group of bleeding disorders where a variety of molecular defects can affect platelet number, function or both. The defects involve deficiencies or dysfunction of platelet receptors, signaling pathways, cytoskeletal proteins, granule contents and abnormalities in procoagulant activity. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish clinically as they present with the common symptom of mucocutaneous bleeding. Inherited thrombocytopenia needs to be considered in all patients suspected of having primary immune thrombocytopenia, where platelets may also have functional defects. After a careful history and physical examination, initial investigations include a complete blood count with a peripheral smear, followed by appropriate specific investigations that often require specialized referral centers. This article is a summary of the current data on clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of inherited platelet disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of HematologySame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207