MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134888419 · doi:10.4043/23819-ms

Power Distribution for Arctic Subsea Tiebacks

2012· article· en· W2134888419 on OpenAlexaff
Terence Hazel, Adrian Woodroffe

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsOceanWorks International (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaSwitchgearBusbarEngineeringElectrical engineeringCircuit breakerModular designVoltageTransformerHigh voltageAutomotive engineeringMarine engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Subsea tiebacks are becomingincreasingly prevalent in oil and gas field developments. As the accessibilityof the production from wellheads becomes more difficult, the need for subseacompression and pumping increases. Compression and pumping require significantpower which can be distributed and controlled from a HVSS (High-Voltage SubseaSubstation). The viability of an Arctic field development will be determined bythe reliability of all elements in the tieback and in particular, thecentralized subsea power distribution system. Introduction This paper presents the conceptual design and capabilities of a modular, expandable and highly reliable subsea HV (High Voltage, U > 1000V)and LV (Low Voltage, U £ 1000V) power distribution system. The assemblyis designed to operate without intervention for extended periods of time and isideally suited to emerging green field developments in the Arctic. The conceptis built from components and subsystems each with a technology readiness levelof six or seven and is therefore well positioned for a prototype build anddeployment with minimal additional qualification. The core switchgear is built around proven 36kV CBs (Circuit-Breakers)connected together via an SF6-insulated bus bar. The use ofSF6 as a dielectric medium allows the size of the CBs and bus barpressure vessel to be minimized, reducing the mass and thus deploymentconstraints of the assembly. Connections to the switchgear assembly for boththe incoming power feed and switched outputs are via wet mate connectors. Theonly components in the main pressure vessel are the CBs, current transformers, voltage transformers and busbars. To maximize the overall system availability, the control and protectionsystems for each 36kV CB are redundant and housed in a series ofrecoverable modules rather than inside the main HV switchgear pressure vessel. Should there be a fault in the control and protection system, the redundancy isdesigned such that a faulty module can be replaced without loss of control ofits associated 36kV CB, thus maintaining production availability. A key and unique feature of this switchgear assembly design is the abilityto power all of the protection, control and communication equipment independentof the main HV AC power. This is achieved by including two high voltage directcurrent and fiber optic cables in the umbilical. At the switchgear module, theHV DC voltage is stepped down to LV DC via a pair of redundant nodes thatdistribute auxiliary power and communication capabilities to the subseaequipment. By independently powering the control and monitoring system, thestatus and position of each CB can be known during a black start without theneed for a subsea battery-supplied UPS (Uninterruptible Power System). Inkeeping with the simple and robust design philosophy, only critical telemetryis provided to monitor and control the system. Where telemetry is provided, itis also redundant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207