MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134905663 · doi:10.12968/bjnn.2012.8.6.346

Spiritual experiences in temporal lobe epilepsy: a literature review

2012· review· en· W2134905663 on OpenAlexaff
Niall McCrae, Samantha Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReligiosityEpilepsyPsychologyIctalTemporal lobeFeelingPsychosocialDevelopmental psychologyNeurosciencePsychotherapistSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profound spiritual experiences have been observed as a trait of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), as described in the Geschwind syndrome. This systematic review considers the evidence for ictal and interictal religiosity, and the neurological, psychiatric and cultural factors. Research in this area is at an early stage of development, with indications that a temporal focus is an important factor in spiritual experiences of epilepsy, albeit as a relatively rare and nebulous trait. The literature indicates that spiritual feelings may arise from a reciprocity of biological and psychosocial factors, but nurseq should afford the possibility of a genuinely transcendent experience. Further research may help to explain whether the complex, partial seizures of TLE are a cause of abnormal religiosity or an accessory to spiritual enlightenment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Neuroscience NursingSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207