MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134953764 · doi:10.7202/018960ar

L’autorégulation de l’apprentissage par la lecture d’adolescents en milieu défavorisé

2008· article· fr· W2134953764 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sylvie C. Cartier, Deborah L. Butler, Michel Janosz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude a pour but de présenter les portraits d’autorégulation, lors de l’apprentissage par la lecture, de 20 545 élèves du secondaire (12 à 17 ans) fréquentant 59 écoles francophones de milieux défavorisés du Québec. Elle repose sur le questionnaire d’évaluation Lire pour apprendre (Cartier et Butler, 2003). Les résultats montrent que les élèves voient une certaine complexité à la situation, par leur interprétation, leurs objectifs et les critères de performance. Le volet apprentissage de la situation est moins ciblé. Par ailleurs, les élèves présentent des portraits d’autorégulation lacunaires. Des différences d’autorégulation entre les élèves du début et de la fin du secondaire ont été observées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.249
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207