MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134960465 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2003.809294

Comparison of the static and dynamic properties of single- and double-pass partially gain-clamped two-stage L-band EDFAs

2003· article· en· W2134960465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical amplifierAmplifierOpticsErbiumNoise figureMaterials scienceFiber amplifierWavelength-division multiplexingErbium doped fiber amplifierPower (physics)Double passOptoelectronicsPhysicsDopingLaserCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the static and dynamic properties of partially gain-clamped two-stage L-band erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) in single- and double-pass configurations. While both amplifiers can be designed to provide the same gain-clamped performance, the double-pass configuration requires /spl ap/40% less pump power and /spl ap/22% shorter length of EDF in the second stage, and has a corresponding improvement in power conversion efficiency of 45%, but at the expense of an increase in noise figure (/spl ap/0.5 dB) and dynamic gain variation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it