MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134972207 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090083

The second-order monostatic HF radar cross section incorporating antenna barge motion

2009· article· en· W2134972207 on OpenAlexaff
J. Walsh, Weimin Huang, Eric W. Gill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadar cross-sectionRadarPhysicsBARGECross section (physics)Bistatic radarBessel functionAntenna (radio)AcousticsRadar imagingOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The second-order HF radar ocean cross section is derived for the case of the transmitting and receiving antenna undergoing platform (i.e. barge) motion. The derivation for electromagnetic patch scatter begins with a general expression for the bistatically received second-order electric field. Based on an assumption that the ocean surface can be described as a Fourier series with coefficients being zero-mean Gaussian random variables, the second-order monostatic radar cross section is developed. The derivation for the hydrodynamic patch scatter follows from an earlier first-order analysis. The second-order HF radar cross section is found to consist of Bessel functions, and no singularity exists in the new electromagnetic coupling coefficient. Simulation results depict the effects of barge motion under a variety of sea states. It is evident that first-order effects spread into the second-order region and thus could have detrimental effects on wave measurement schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207