MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134977217 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557365

Artificial neural network applications for power system protection

2006· article· en· W2134977217 on OpenAlex
Gaganpreet Chawla, Manoj Sachdev, G. Ramak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer sciencePhysical neural networkElectric power systemPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceTime delay neural networkTypes of artificial neural networks

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most commonly used systems for protecting transmission and subtransmission lines belong to the family of distance relays. Over the past eighty years, successful designs based on electromechanical, solid-state and digital electronics technologies have been produced and marketed. These relays implement various characteristics, such as impedance, offset-impedance, admittance, reactance and blinders. The artificial neural network based designs of distance relays proposed so far work well for ideal fault conditions but are not able to maintain the integrity of the boundaries of the relay characteristics of generic designs. This paper reviews ANN models that have been proposed in the past for protecting components of power systems and presents a methodology that fully exploits the potential of ANNs in designing generic distance relays that retain the integrity of the boundaries of their characteristics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207