MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134986035 · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.4.925

Type 1 Diabetes and Autism

2005· article· en· W2134986035 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sloane Freeman, Wendy Roberts, Denis Daneman

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusAutismType 2 diabetesPsychiatryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of diabetes in children and youth <18 years of age is ∼1 in 400–500 (1). The prevalence of diabetes for those aged <19 years from 1995–2000 in Ontario was 1.87 per 1,000 (2). Type 1 diabetes is recognized as a T-cell–mediated autoimmune process with a strong genetic contribution (3,4). In 2003, the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder was reported in one study as 3.4 per 1,000 children (5) and in another as 6.7 per 1,000 children (4 per 1,000 children with autism) aged 3–10 years (6) in the U.S. Like type 1 diabetes, both immune-mediated and genetic factors have been implicated in the development of autism (7,8). Based on recent clinical experiences and on the putative autoimmune etiology of these two conditions, we hypothesized that there would be an increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorder in a population of children with type 1 diabetes. To investigate this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review of nearly …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207