MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134991696 · doi:10.1051/medsci/20102610875

Âge et stress oxydant

2010· review· fr· W2134991696 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathalie Thorin‐Trescases, Guillaume Voghel, Nada Farhat, Annick Drouin, Marie-Ève Gendron, Éric Thorin

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2010
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHormesisOxidative stressLongevityCell biologyHomeostasisEndogenySenescenceAgeingEndotheliumOxidative damageStressorBiologyNeuroscienceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to maintain cellular homeostasis against endogenous and exogenous aggressions, different cellular mechanisms of defence, maintenance and repair are continuously activated throughout life. Hormesis, a concept based on the fact that mild stresses protect cells against subsequent stresses, amplifies the efficacy of the cellular mechanisms of defence and repair. Ageing, senescence and ultimately death, result from the exhaustion of these mechanisms maintaining cellular functions. One of the major sources of vascular endothelial damage is oxidative stress. The age-dependent shift in the redox environment towards pro-oxidation contributes to a progressive compensatory remodelling of the endothelium, an accumulation of damages, and its dysfunction, the premises for atherosclerosis. We propose that in agreement with the concept of hormesis, a moderate exposure during endothelial maturation to mild physiological oxidative stressors determines -vascular longevity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207