MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2135032019 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1998.744983

Finite state controller for functional electrical stimulation: software implementation

2002· article· en· W2135032019 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Wang, B.J. Andrews

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Finite-state machineComputer scienceState (computer science)MicrocontrollerPID controllerSoftwareOpen-loop controllerControl engineeringFunction (biology)Control theory (sociology)Embedded systemControl (management)Programming languageEngineeringTemperature controlArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finite state machine provides a flexible framework to design controllers for Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). The finite state machine controller allows the implementation of different control strategies under different states. This paper describes the software implementation of finite state machine controller for a portable FES stimulator based on 68332 microcontroller. The states, actions and state transition rules are defined in a text based controller definition file which is edited by users and downloaded to the portable FES stimulator from PC via serial RS232 link. The definition file also defines the stimulation output channels, sensor input channels, and constants which are used in actions and rules. Several commonly used stimulation actions such as pulsewidth/frequency change, pulsewidth ramp are pre-defined. More complex controllers like fuzzy logic controller or PID controller can be incorporated into the finite state controller using customized C controller function. This finite state FES controller is easy to use for ordinary users without computer programming knowledge, yet flexible enough to incorporate complex control functions for expert users who can write the customized C controller function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→