MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A global reorganization of the metabolome in <i>Arabidopsis</i> during cold acclimation is revealed by metabolic fingerprinting

2005· article· en· W2135051127 on OpenAlexafffund
Gordon R. Gray, Doug Heath

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsPhenomenome Discoveries (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetabolomeArabidopsisAcclimatizationMetabolomicsBiologyMetaboliteFreezing toleranceArabidopsis thalianaMetabolismBotanyBiochemistryBioinformaticsMutantGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many plants, including Arabidopsis , increase their freezing tolerance in response to low, non‐freezing temperatures. This process is known as cold acclimation and involves many complex biochemical changes at the level of the metabolome. Our goal was to examine the effects of cold acclimation on the metabolome using a non‐targeted metabolic fingerprinting approach. Multivariate data analyses indicate that, in Arabidopsis, a global reprogramming of metabolism occurs as a result of cold acclimation. By measuring an entire spectrum of putative metabolites based on mass‐to‐charge ( m / z ) ratios, vs. an individual or group of metabolite(s), a comprehensive, unbiased assessment of metabolic processes relative to cold acclimation was determined. Whereas leaves shifted to low temperature present metabolic profiles that are constantly changing, leaves developed at low temperature demonstrate a stable complement of components. Although it appears that some metabolic networks are modulated by the environment, others require development under low‐temperature conditions for adjustment. Understanding how metabolism as a whole is regulated allows the integration of cellular, physiological and ecological attributes in a biological system, a necessity if complex traits, such as freezing tolerance, are to be modified by breeding or genetic manipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207