Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The data reviewed in this paper reveal that individual differences in the response to alterations in energy balance induced by diet or exercise are ubiquitous. These differences are observed in a variety of obesity-related phenotypes, including body weight, body fatness, and abdominal visceral fat. Although little is known about the causes of the heterogeneity in responsiveness to dietary habits or to regular exercise, the evidence accumulated so far suggests that genetic factors may play an important role in determining the response of body mass and body fat stores to chronic alterations in energy balance. It is likely that genetic variation at several genes contributes to this heterogeneity of responses and thus to the susceptibility to obesity. Research on the genetic and molecular basis of gene-environment interactions has become a major area of investigation. One can, therefore, anticipate that major advances will occur in the coming years with respect to the identification of the genetic and molecular causes of the susceptibility to the most common diseases, including obesity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it