MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135096888 · doi:10.18800/lexis.201401.006

En aquí, en allá: adverbios demostrativos de lugar en el español de migrantes andinos bolivianos

2014· article· es· W2135096888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLexis · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En la presente exposición, nos vamos a ocupar de los adverbios demostrativos de lugar tal y como aparecen en el español hablado por cinco migrantes andinos bolivianos. Veremos, por ejemplo, que la forma aquí alterna con en aquí, o que allá alterna con en allá. ¿Por qué esos migrantes, de tradición quechua o aimara más o menos fuerte, realizan tales alternancias? ¿Cuál es la lógica interna de ese uso? Pretendemos responder a estas preguntas a través de un análisis de cinco entrevistas recientes, dos de ellas hechas a hablantes que han migrado a La Paz; y tres, a hablantes que han migrado a San Pedro de Atacama, en el norte de Chile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it