MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135157932 · doi:10.1109/icwc.1992.200804

Spread spectrum transmission in the 902-928 MHz band

2003· article· en· W2135157932 on OpenAlexaff
J.G. Acres, Albin Severinson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCoquitlam College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath interferenceSpread spectrumMultipath propagationInterference (communication)FadingFrequency-hopping spread spectrumComputer scienceDiversity schemeTransmission (telecommunications)Sequence (biology)Direct-sequence spread spectrumRadio spectrumSpectrum (functional analysis)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 902-928 MHz band has been assigned, on a nonprotected basis, to unlicensed spread spectrum devices subject to the constraints outlined in DOC TR76 and FCC Part 15.247. The rules allow for direct sequence, frequency hopping and combinations of both. The specified operating parameters, interference environment and typical propagation conditions suggest certain limitations which may not be consistent with general expectations. The authors discuss the rules and the potential licensed and unlicensed interference sources and propagation conditions faced by these spread spectrum devices. The attributes of direct sequence and frequency hopping systems are presented and compared in various interference scenarios. The diversity properties of spread spectrum in multipath fading environments are analyzed.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207