MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135171144 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.1990.99665

New procedures for 2-D and 3-D microwave circuit analysis with the TLM method

2002· article· en· W2135171144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandMatrix (chemical analysis)Classification of discontinuitiesMicrowaveComputer scienceWaveguideBoundary (topology)Function (biology)Boundary value problemTransmission lineAlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringOpticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four contributions to numerical field modeling with the TLM (transmission line matrix) method are presented: (1) the formulation of a 3-D Johns matrix (or numerical Green's function) for wideband non-TEM (transverse electromagnetic)-absorbing boundary conditions using the 3-D condensed TLM node; (2) use of a tapered Johns matrix (or numerical Green's function) for improving the return loss of frequency dispersive absorbing boundaries; (3) a recursive algorithm for wideband non-TEM absorbing boundary modeling; and (4) a pseudoparallel iteration scheme for the simultaneous processing of TLM substructures. These procedures are essential for efficient time-domain modeling of 3-D waveguide discontinuities of arbitrary geometries. Their application saves considerable computer run-time and memory when compared with conventional TLM analysis.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it