MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135207425 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.804864

Power system dynamic load modeling using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system

2003· article· en· W2135207425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemElectric power systemComputer scienceDynamic demandControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemSystem dynamicsPower (physics)Fuzzy logicStability (learning theory)Fuzzy inference systemRepresentation (politics)Control engineeringArtificial neural networkFuzzy control systemAdaptive systemInference systemEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The representation of the dynamic characteristics of power system loads is widely used for obtaining power system operations, controls and stability limits and becomes a critical factor in power system dynamic performance. In this paper, the performance of power system dynamic load modeling using adaptive-network-base fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is compared with traditional architectures. The ANFIS models can represent nonlinear systems performance accurately, and they are promising for dynamic load models. Computer simulations show excellent results using this approach for power system dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207