MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135223171 · doi:10.1109/isee.2004.1299706

Environmental implications of PCB manufacturing in china

2004· article· en· W2135223171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jingwei Wang, Jinqiu Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaBusinessPrinted circuit boardQuarter (Canadian coin)Environmental pollutionManufacturingPollutionControl (management)Agricultural economicsEngineeringEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceGeographyEconomicsMarketingManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By 2003, China has become the second largest printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturer in the world. Compared with same period of last year, import and export of PCBs in the first quarter of 2003 have increased 40.2% and 24.8%, respectively, and PCB yield in the first half of 2003 has increased 34.6%. Obviously, the rapid growth of the PCB industry has contributed to China's economy. Nonetheless, it has also imposed threats to the environment due to 90% of PCB manufacturers being small and medium sized enterprises (SME), no specific pollution control legislations are available to date, and the recycling is done largely by farmers in rural areas. This paper gives a survey of the PCB manufacturing industry of China and in addition presents problems of pollution prevention and control of the industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207